CPG

CPG Product Innovation & Sensory Testing

Quantify the exact flavor profiles that drive market success.

Consumer Packaged Goods brands spend millions on sensory testing panels, ingredient trials, and focus groups, but often struggle to quantify the exact flavor profiles that drive market success. By ingesting thousands of consumer tasting logs, recipe variations, and localized market data, food scientists and product managers can instantly identify the winning combinations of texture, sweetness, and aroma.

The platform cross-tabulates these sensory attributes with demographic groups to reveal hyper-specific preferences, like a spicy-sweet profile performing exponentially better among urban millennials. Research teams can generate presentation-ready reports that mathematically prove which product formulations will maximize shelf velocity. This drastically reduces time-to-market for new food innovations and minimizes the risk of costly nationwide product launch failures.

Expand
Rank Flavor Drivers
Spicy-Sweet
63%
Crisp Texture
48%
Citrus Aroma
37%
Low Sugar
26%
Base Column
flavor_profile ▾
Value Column
repurchase ▾
63%ofSpicy-Sweet=Repurchase
predictive power
89%
repurchase count
189
panel count
300
see examples

AI Topic Mapping

Use Steeped AI's AI topic mapping to transform open-ended focus group feedback into measurable data points, categorizing "too chewy" versus "perfectly crisp" instead of leaving them as loose comments. Quantify every sensory reaction so recipe decisions rest on counts, not the tasting panel's loudest voice.

too chewyperfectly crisparoma appeal

Customer Journey Mapping

Apply Steeped AI's journey mapping to trace the consumer's sensory journey from initial aroma to aftertaste. Quantify exactly which phase drives the intent to repurchase, so formulation effort concentrates on the moment that actually converts a taster into a buyer.

peak +31%aromarebuyIntent +22%

Statistical Significance Testing

Steeped AI's automated significance testing ensures that a winning flavor profile in a test panel is a mathematically true market signal, not random noise. A university-grade, 3-part framework keeps every result defensible, so you commit to a national launch on evidence, not a lucky panel.

Flavor Signal Confirmedp < 0.01 · FDR corrected

Insight Deeplinks

Every winning profile deeplinks to the exact tasting logs and panel responses behind it, so a food scientist can verify the signal before committing a formulation to production. No black-box scores and no hallucinated preferences, just traceable evidence from the panel that produced it.

Sensory Finding Citations
1 63% of "spicy-sweet" panels marked "would rebuy"
2 48% of "crisp" logs beat the "control" texture
3 37% of "citrus aroma" tests lifted "first impression"
4 31% of "urban millennial" tasters preferred "bold heat"
5 22% of "aftertaste" notes drove "repurchase intent"
6 14% of "low sugar" variants lost "flavor depth"
7 9% of "portion" comments flagged "too chewy"

The insights are already in your data.

Ask your data anything. Get real findings ranked by impact, with AI reports your team can present and share on the spot.